Older Adults, Autonomy, and Dignity
What exactly is dignity?
What is autonomy? The majority of healthcare professionals have a vague
idea of these concepts, yet dignity and autonomy have profound impacts on older
adults, especially those who have impaired cognition. Those terms are not
commonly used in conversation, although dignity and autonomy are the
cornerstone of person-centered care. It is our moral duty to respect the rights
of all humans. Older adults with impaired cognition are especially vulnerable and
therefore, dignity and autonomy have profound ethical consequences.
Dignity
has two aspects including human dignity and dignity of identity. Human
dignity relates to biomedical ethics and suggests that all humans have
intrinsic [fundamental] value and rights because they are human beings. Human
dignity is applied and preserved in clinical settings and part of
standards of patient care and suggests that every human has the right to be
treated in a respectful manner. Dignity of identity is also known as autonomy
or self-governance, is “the capacity of a person to choose and act
on the basis of their own preferences regarding their life and their own body”
(Rejno et al., 2020, p. 105). Decisional autonomy and autonomy of
execution are two subsets of dignity of identity.
Understanding
the consequences of decisions and being able to execute them are imperative for
retaining autonomy and self-governance. Cognitive impairment alone does not
determine whether self-governance is compromised. People with cognitive
impairment may retain their decision-making abilities until such time that they
do not understand the consequences. Resorting to paternalism or taking away
their decision-making because they are old or have cognitive losses results in
violating their human rights and dignity.
A
diagnosis of degenerative dementia [one that progresses over time] should
trigger consultation with and elder law attorney for advance directives and/or
living wills so that their wishes, made when they have decisional autonomy and
autonomy of execution, are later carried out on their behalf (Muiznieks, 2018).
An
investigation by the World Health Organization found that in Europe, there were
four million older people who experienced maltreatment in long-term care
annually. Examples of human rights violations included “lack of medical care, verbal
and physical aggression, overuse of medication, locking doors from the outside,
disrespecting patient intimacy [showering together], lack of heating, lack of
food, and not allowing patients to file written complaints” (Muiznieks, 2018,
p. 3).
There
is a gray area in understanding decisional autonomy and autonomy of execution,
especially among family members who believe that getting old requires
authoritarian edicts including less freedom, fewer choices, more restrictions
and limitations, and withholding of affection. Another type of human rights
violation concerns money and how it is spent in old age. In most families I
have dealt with, grown children exert undue influence and pressure on financial
decisions with the intent of “preserving their inheritance.” They make
recommendations based on their own self-serving intentions, a violation of basic
human rights and dignity.
References:
Muiznieks, N. (January 18,
2018). The right of older persons to dignity and autonomy in care. Council
of Europe, Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/commissioner/-the-right-of-older-persons-to-dignity-and-autonomy-in-care
Rejno, A., Ternestedt, B.,
Nordenfelt, L., Silfverberg, G., & Godspeed, T.E. (2020). Dignity at stake:
Caring for persons with impaired autonomy. Nursing Ethics, 27(1),
104-115. doi 10.1177/0969733019845128 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31104584/
Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash
Comments