Older Adults, Autonomy, and Dignity

 



What exactly is dignity? What is autonomy? The majority of healthcare professionals have a vague idea of these concepts, yet dignity and autonomy have profound impacts on older adults, especially those who have impaired cognition. Those terms are not commonly used in conversation, although dignity and autonomy are the cornerstone of person-centered care. It is our moral duty to respect the rights of all humans. Older adults with impaired cognition are especially vulnerable and therefore, dignity and autonomy have profound ethical consequences.

Dignity has two aspects including human dignity and dignity of identity. Human dignity relates to biomedical ethics and suggests that all humans have intrinsic [fundamental] value and rights because they are human beings. Human dignity is applied and preserved in clinical settings and part of standards of patient care and suggests that every human has the right to be treated in a respectful manner. Dignity of identity is also known as autonomy or self-governance, is “the capacity of a person to choose and act on the basis of their own preferences regarding their life and their own body” (Rejno et al., 2020, p. 105). Decisional autonomy and autonomy of execution are two subsets of dignity of identity.

Understanding the consequences of decisions and being able to execute them are imperative for retaining autonomy and self-governance. Cognitive impairment alone does not determine whether self-governance is compromised. People with cognitive impairment may retain their decision-making abilities until such time that they do not understand the consequences. Resorting to paternalism or taking away their decision-making because they are old or have cognitive losses results in violating their human rights and dignity.

A diagnosis of degenerative dementia [one that progresses over time] should trigger consultation with and elder law attorney for advance directives and/or living wills so that their wishes, made when they have decisional autonomy and autonomy of execution, are later carried out on their behalf (Muiznieks, 2018).

An investigation by the World Health Organization found that in Europe, there were four million older people who experienced maltreatment in long-term care annually. Examples of human rights violations included “lack of medical care, verbal and physical aggression, overuse of medication, locking doors from the outside, disrespecting patient intimacy [showering together], lack of heating, lack of food, and not allowing patients to file written complaints” (Muiznieks, 2018, p. 3).

There is a gray area in understanding decisional autonomy and autonomy of execution, especially among family members who believe that getting old requires authoritarian edicts including less freedom, fewer choices, more restrictions and limitations, and withholding of affection. Another type of human rights violation concerns money and how it is spent in old age. In most families I have dealt with, grown children exert undue influence and pressure on financial decisions with the intent of “preserving their inheritance.” They make recommendations based on their own self-serving intentions, a violation of basic human rights and dignity.

References:

Muiznieks, N. (January 18, 2018). The right of older persons to dignity and autonomy in care. Council of Europe, Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/commissioner/-the-right-of-older-persons-to-dignity-and-autonomy-in-care

 

Rejno, A., Ternestedt, B., Nordenfelt, L., Silfverberg, G., & Godspeed, T.E. (2020). Dignity at stake: Caring for persons with impaired autonomy. Nursing Ethics, 27(1), 104-115. doi 10.1177/0969733019845128 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31104584/

 

Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Generic Prescription Drugs - You Decide Who Benefits

Voter Resources

Hoarding Disorder ~ Facts Not Fiction